Thank you for the explanation. Is good to know that there really were an
incompatibility problem, and not a mistake during config.

Thank you again for your work and time.
Regards.

El 28/12/2017 9:55, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> escribió:

> Sebastian,
>
> XenServer 7.1 and 7.2 aren't supported in 4.9.x  - the main fix is to add
> the guest OS mappings to the database. These have been added for 4.11, but
> there seems to be a slight change in behaviour in XS7.1 when adding a host
> to a cluster which is confusing CloudStack.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 December 2017 08:08
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrading to XenServer 7.x
>
> Hi all.
>
> I had a similar problem, but usign XenServer 7.2. It was a fresh
> installation from scratch. The system vms where created, but them *could'nt
> get the local link IP*, so the cloudstack agent never went up.
>
> After that, I found the compatibility matrix, where its specified that the
> compatible versions of XenServer are up to 7.0...
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-
> release-notes/en/4.9.2.0/compat.html#supported-hypervisor-versions
>
> That's the point where I'm, trying to configure them with XS 7.0, but
> unfortunately XS 7.0 does not provide drivers for our Broadcom
> BCM57412 10Gb network eth adapters.
> Here we are, working on how to add the drivers...
>
>
> Good luck!
>
>
>
>
> Atentamente,
> Sebastián Gómez
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just as FYI, we recently upgrade from 6.5 to xs 7.1, so far everthing
> > is good. Then we add some hosts to Pool or reinstall some XenServer to
> > have proper new filesystem on dom0 which have more disk space for
> /var/log!
> >  then we ran into the situation where CloudStack fail to create
> > Virtual Router in a XenServer cluster. Turns out that for some unknown
> > reason, adding a fresh installed xenserver to a cluster can create new
> > SR and VDI for xs-tools iso, this break cloudstack VR creation for
> > some reason. So the easy fix is to forget non-shared SR containing
> xs-tools VDI.
> >
> > Basically, if "xe vdi-list is-tools-iso=true" return more than one
> > iso, CloudStack should fail to create Virtual-Router.
> >
>

Reply via email to