Rafael
Here is the output as requested -
mysql> mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where removed is null;
+----+------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+------+----------------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-----------------+---------------------+---------+-------------+--------+-----------------------+-------+------------+---------+---------------+
| id | name | uuid | pool_type | port |
data_center_id | pod_id | cluster_id | used_bytes | capacity_bytes |
host_address | user_info | path | created | removed |
update_time | status | storage_provider_name | scope | hypervisor | managed |
capacity_iops |
+----+------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+------+----------------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-----------------+---------------------+---------+-------------+--------+-----------------------+-------+------------+---------+---------------+
| 1 | ds1 | a234224f-05fb-3f4c-9b0f-c51ebdf9a601 | NetworkFilesystem | 2049 |
1 | NULL | NULL | 6059720704 | 79133933568 | 172.30.5.2
| NULL | /export/primary | 2018-06-05 13:45:01 | NULL | NULL |
Up | DefaultPrimary | ZONE | KVM | 0 | NULL |
+----+------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+------+----------------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-----------------+---------------------+---------+-------------+--------+-----------------------+-------+------------+---------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql>
Do you think this problem is related to my NIC/bridge configuration or the way
I am configuring the zone ?
Jon
________________________________
From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
Sent: 07 June 2018 06:45
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
Can you also post the result of:
select * from cloud.storage_pool where removed is null
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Still confused where your primary storage pools are – are you sure your
> hosts are in cluster 1?
>
> Quick question just to make sure - assuming management/storage is on the
> same NIC when I setup basic networking the physical network has the
> management and guest icons already there and I just edit the KVM labels. If
> I am running storage over management do I need to drag the storage icon to
> the physical network and use the same KVM label (cloudbr0) as the
> management or does CS automatically just use the management NIC ie. I would
> only need to drag the storage icon across in basic setup if I wanted it on
> a different NIC/IP subnet ? (hope that makes sense !)
>
> >> I would do both – set up your 2/3 physical networks, name isn’t that
> important – but then drag the traffic types to the correct one and make
> sure the labels are correct.
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 06/06/2018, 12:39, "Jon Marshall" <jms....@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Dag
>
>
> Do you mean check the pools with "Infrastructure -> Primary Storage"
> and "Infrastructure -> Secondary Storage" within the UI ?
>
>
> If so Primary Storage has a state of UP, secondary storage does not
> show a state as such so not sure where else to check it ?
>
>
> Rerun of the command -
>
> mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1;
> Empty set (0.00 sec)
>
> mysql>
>
> I think it is something to do with my zone creation rather than the
> NIC, bridge setup although I can post those if needed.
>
> I may try to setup just the 2 NIC solution you mentioned although as I
> say I had the same issue with that ie. host goes to "Altert" state and same
> error messages. The only time I can get it to go to "Down" state is when
> it is all on the single NIC.
>
> Quick question just to make sure - assuming management/storage is on
> the same NIC when I setup basic networking the physical network has the
> management and guest icons already there and I just edit the KVM labels. If
> I am running storage over management do I need to drag the storage icon to
> the physical network and use the same KVM label (cloudbr0) as the
> management or does CS automatically just use the management NIC ie. I would
> only need to drag the storage icon across in basic setup if I wanted it on
> a different NIC/IP subnet ? (hope that makes sense !)
>
> On the plus side I have been at this for so long now and done so many
> rebuilds I could do it in my sleep now 😊
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
> Sent: 06 June 2018 12:28
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> Looks OK to me Jon.
>
> The one thing that throws me is your storage pools – can you rerun
> your query: select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1;
>
> Do the pools show up as online in the CloudStack GUI?
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 06/06/2018, 12:08, "Jon Marshall" <jms....@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Don't know whether this helps or not but I logged into the SSVM
> and ran an ifconfig -
>
>
> eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 169.254.3.35 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast
> 169.254.255.255
> ether 0e:00:a9:fe:03:23 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
> RX packets 141 bytes 20249 (19.7 KiB)
> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
> TX packets 108 bytes 16287 (15.9 KiB)
> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
> eth1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 172.30.3.34 netmask 255.255.255.192 broadcast
> 172.30.3.63
> ether 1e:00:3b:00:00:05 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
> RX packets 56722 bytes 4953133 (4.7 MiB)
> RX errors 0 dropped 44573 overruns 0 frame 0
> TX packets 11224 bytes 1234932 (1.1 MiB)
> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
> eth2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 172.30.4.86 netmask 255.255.255.128 broadcast
> 172.30.4.127
> ether 1e:00:d9:00:00:53 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
> RX packets 366191 bytes 435300557 (415.1 MiB)
> RX errors 0 dropped 39456 overruns 0 frame 0
> TX packets 145065 bytes 7978602 (7.6 MiB)
> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
> eth3: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 172.30.5.14 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast
> 172.30.5.15
> ether 1e:00:cb:00:00:1a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
> RX packets 132440 bytes 426362982 (406.6 MiB)
> RX errors 0 dropped 39446 overruns 0 frame 0
> TX packets 67443 bytes 423670834 (404.0 MiB)
> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
> lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
> loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
> RX packets 18 bytes 1440 (1.4 KiB)
> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
> TX packets 18 bytes 1440 (1.4 KiB)
> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
>
> so it has interfaces in both the management and the storage
> subnets (as well as guest).
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jon Marshall <jms....@hotmail.co.uk>
> Sent: 06 June 2018 11:08
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> Hi Rafael
>
>
> Thanks for the help, really appreciate it.
>
>
> So rerunning that command with all servers up -
>
>
>
> mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and
> removed is null;
> Empty set (0.00 sec)
>
> mysql>
>
>
> As for the storage IP no I'm not setting it to be the management
> IP when I setup the zone but the output of the SQL command suggests that is
> what has happened.
>
> As I said to Dag I am using a different subnet for storage ie.
>
> 172.30.3.0/26 - management subnet
> 172.30.4.0/25 - guest VM subnet
> 172.30.5.0/28 - storage
>
> the NFS server IP is 172.30.5.2
>
> each compute node has 3 NICs with an IP from each subnet (i am
> assuming the management node only needs an IP in the management network ?)
>
> When I add the zone in the UI I have one physical network with
> management (cloudbr0), guest (cloudbr1) and storage (cloudbr2).
> When I fill in the storage traffic page I use the range
> 172.16.5.10 - 14 as free IPs as I exclude the ones already allocated to the
> compute nodes and the NFS server.
>
> I think maybe I am doing something wrong in the UI setup but it is
> not obvious to me what it is.
>
> What I might try today unless you want me to keep the setup I have
> for more outputs is to go back to 2 NICs, one for storage/management and
> one for guest VMs.
>
> I think with the 2 NICs setup the mistake I made last time when
> adding the zone was to assume storage would just run over management so I
> did not drag and drop the storage icon and assign it to cloudbr0 as with
> the management which I think is what I should do ?
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 06 June 2018 10:54
> To: users
> Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
> Jon, do not panic we are here to help you :)
> So, I might have mistyped the SQL query. You you use select * from
> cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and removed is not null ",
> you are
> listing the storage pools removed. Therefore, the right query
> would be "
> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and removed
> is null "
>
> There is also something else I do not understand. You are setting
> the
> storage IP in the management subnet? I am not sure if you should
> be doing
> like this. Normally, I set all my storages (primary[when working
> with NFS]
> and secondary) to IPs in the storage subnet.
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Dag Sonstebo <
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > I’m late to this thread and have possibly missed some things –
> but a
> > couple of observations:
> >
> > “When I add the zone and get to the storage web page I exclude
> the IPs
> > already used for the compute node NICs and the NFS server
> itself. …..”
> > “So the range is 172.30.5.1 -> 15 and the range I fill in is
> 172.30.5.10
> > -> 172.30.5.14.”
> >
> > I think you may have some confusion around the use of the
> storage network.
> > The important part here is to understand this is for *secondary
> storage*
> > use only – it has nothing to do with primary storage. This means
> this
> > storage network needs to be accessible to the SSVM, to the
> hypervisors, and
> > secondary storage NFS pools needs to be accessible on this
> network.
> >
> > The important part – this also means you *can not use the same
> IP ranges
> > for management and storage networks* - doing so means you will
> have issues
> > where effectively both hypervisors and SSVM can see the same
> subnet on two
> > NICs – and you end up in a routing black hole.
> >
> > So – you need to either:
> >
> > 1) Use different IP subnets on management and storage, or
> > 2) preferably just simplify your setup – stop using a secondary
> storage
> > network altogether and just allow secondary storage to use the
> management
> > network (which is default). Unless you have a very high I/O
> environment in
> > production you are just adding complexity by running separate
> management
> > and storage.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dag Sonstebo
> > Cloud Architect
> > ShapeBlue
> >
> > On 06/06/2018, 10:18, "Jon Marshall" <jms....@hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > I will disconnect the host this morning and test but before
> I do that
> > I ran this command when all hosts are up -
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > select * from cloud.host;
> > +----+-----------------+------------------------------------
> > --+--------+--------------------+--------------------+------
> > -----------+---------------------+--------------------+-----
> > ------------+---------------------+----------------------+--
> > ---------------------+-------------------+------------+-----
> > --------------+-----------------+--------------------+------
> > ------+----------------+--------+-------------+------+------
> > -+-------------------------------------+---------+----------
> > -------+--------------------+------------+----------+-------
> > ---+--------+------------+--------------+-------------------
> > --------------------------------------------+-----------+---
> > ----+-------------+------------+----------------+-----------
> > ----------+---------------------+---------+--------------+--
> > --------------+-------+-------------+--------------+
> > | id | name | uuid
> | status
> > | type | private_ip_address | private_netmask |
> > private_mac_address | storage_ip_address | storage_netmask |
> > storage_mac_address | storage_ip_address_2 |
> storage_mac_address_2 |
> > storage_netmask_2 | cluster_id | public_ip_address |
> public_netmask |
> > public_mac_address | proxy_port | data_center_id | pod_id |
> cpu_sockets |
> > cpus | speed | url | fs_type |
> > hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | ram | resource |
> version |
> > parent | total_size | capabilities | guid
> > | available | setup | dom0_memory |
> last_ping |
> > mgmt_server_id | disconnected | created |
> removed |
> > update_count | resource_state | owner | lastUpdated |
> engine_state |
> > +----+-----------------+------------------------------------
> > --+--------+--------------------+--------------------+------
> > -----------+---------------------+--------------------+-----
> > ------------+---------------------+----------------------+--
> > ---------------------+-------------------+------------+-----
> > --------------+-----------------+--------------------+------
> > ------+----------------+--------+-------------+------+------
> > -+-------------------------------------+---------+----------
> > -------+--------------------+------------+----------+-------
> > ---+--------+------------+--------------+-------------------
> > --------------------------------------------+-----------+---
> > ----+-------------+------------+----------------+-----------
> > ----------+---------------------+---------+--------------+--
> > --------------+-------+-------------+--------------+
> > | 1 | dcp-cscn1.local | d97b930c-ab5f-4b7d-9243-eabd60012284
> | Up
> > | Routing | 172.30.3.3 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 00:22:19:92:4e:34 | 172.30.3.3 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 00:22:19:92:4e:34 | NULL | NULL
> | NULL
> > | 1 | 172.30.4.3 | 255.255.255.128 |
> > 00:22:19:92:4e:35 | NULL | 1 | 1 |
> 1 |
> > 2 | 2999 | iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:fa437fb0c023 | NULL |
> KVM
> > | NULL | 7510159360 | NULL | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | hvm,snapshot | 9f2b15cb-1b75-321b-bf59-f83e7a5e8efb-
> LibvirtComputingResource
> > | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1492390408 | 146457912294 |
> > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:44:33 | NULL |
> 4 |
> > Enabled | NULL | NULL | Disabled |
> > | 2 | v-2-VM | ce1f4594-2b4f-4b2b-a239-3f5e2c2215b0
> | Up
> > | ConsoleProxy | 172.30.3.49 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 1e:00:80:00:00:14 | 172.30.3.49 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 1e:00:80:00:00:14 | NULL | NULL
> | NULL
> > | NULL | 172.30.4.98 | 255.255.255.128 |
> > 1e:00:c9:00:00:5f | NULL | 1 | 1 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | NULL | NoIqn | NULL |
> NULL
> > | NULL | 0 | NULL | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | NULL | Proxy.2-ConsoleProxyResource
> > | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1492390409 |
> 146457912294 |
> > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:46:22 | NULL |
> 7 |
> > Enabled | NULL | NULL | Disabled |
> > | 3 | s-1-VM | 107d0a8e-e2d1-42b5-8b9d-ff3845bb556c
> | Up
> > | SecondaryStorageVM | 172.30.3.34 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 1e:00:3b:00:00:05 | 172.30.3.34 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 1e:00:3b:00:00:05 | NULL | NULL
> | NULL
> > | NULL | 172.30.4.86 | 255.255.255.128 |
> > 1e:00:d9:00:00:53 | NULL | 1 | 1 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | NULL | NoIqn | NULL |
> NULL
> > | NULL | 0 | NULL | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | NULL | s-1-VM-NfsSecondaryStorageResource
> > | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1492390407 |
> 146457912294
> > | 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:46:27 | NULL |
> 7 |
> > Enabled | NULL | NULL | Disabled |
> > | 4 | dcp-cscn2.local | f0c076cb-112f-4f4b-a5a4-1a96ffac9794
> | Up
> > | Routing | 172.30.3.4 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 00:26:b9:4a:97:7d | 172.30.3.4 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 00:26:b9:4a:97:7d | NULL | NULL
> | NULL
> > | 1 | 172.30.4.4 | 255.255.255.128 |
> > 00:26:b9:4a:97:7e | NULL | 1 | 1 |
> 1 |
> > 2 | 2999 | iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:e9b4aa7e7881 | NULL |
> KVM
> > | NULL | 7510159360 | NULL | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | hvm,snapshot | 40e58399-fc7a-3a59-8f48-16d0f99b11c9-
> LibvirtComputingResource
> > | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1492450882 | 146457912294 |
> > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:46:33 | NULL |
> 8 |
> > Enabled | NULL | NULL | Disabled |
> > | 5 | dcp-cscn3.local | 0368ae16-550f-43a9-bb40-ee29d2b5c274
> | Up
> > | Routing | 172.30.3.5 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 00:24:e8:73:6a:b2 | 172.30.3.5 | 255.255.255.192 |
> > 00:24:e8:73:6a:b2 | NULL | NULL
> | NULL
> > | 1 | 172.30.4.5 | 255.255.255.128 |
> > 00:24:e8:73:6a:b3 | NULL | 1 | 1 |
> 1 |
> > 2 | 3000 | iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:ccdce43aff1c | NULL |
> KVM
> > | NULL | 7510159360 | NULL | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL |
> > NULL | hvm,snapshot | 10bb1c01-0e92-3108-8209-37f3eebad8fb-
> LibvirtComputingResource
> > | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1492390408 | 146457912294 |
> > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:47:04 | NULL |
> 6 |
> > Enabled | NULL | NULL | Disabled |
> > +----+-----------------+------------------------------------
> > --+--------+--------------------+--------------------+------
> > -----------+---------------------+--------------------+-----
> > ------------+---------------------+----------------------+--
> > ---------------------+-------------------+------------+-----
> > --------------+-----------------+--------------------+------
> > ------+----------------+--------+-------------+------+------
> > -+-------------------------------------+---------+----------
> > -------+--------------------+------------+----------+-------
> > ---+--------+------------+--------------+-------------------
> > --------------------------------------------+-----------+---
> > ----+-------------+------------+----------------+-----------
> > ----------+---------------------+---------+--------------+--
> > --------------+-------+-------------+--------------+
> > 5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
> >
> >
> >
> > and you can see that it says the storage IP address is the
> same as the
> > private IP address (the management network).
> >
> >
> > I also ran the command you provided using the Cluster ID
> number from
> > the table above -
> >
> >
> >
> > mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1
> and
> > removed is not null;
> > Empty set (0.00 sec)
> >
> > mysql>
> >
> > So assuming I am reading this correctly that seems to be the
> issue.
> >
> >
> > I am at a loss as to why though.
> >
> >
> > I have a separate NIC for storage as described. When I add
> the zone
> > and get to the storage web page I exclude the IPs already used
> for the
> > compute node NICs and the NFS server itself. I do this because
> initially I
> > didn't and the SSVM started using the IP address of the NFS
> server.
> >
> >
> > So the range is 172.30.5.1 -> 15 and the range I fill in is
> > 172.30.5.10 -> 172.30.5.14.
> >
> >
> > And I used the label "cloudbr2" for storage.
> >
> >
> > I must be doing this wrong somehow.
> >
> >
> > Any pointers would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 05 June 2018 16:13
> > To: users
> > Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to
> VMs
> >
> > That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth...
> > This is the code that is generating that odd message.
> >
> > > List<StoragePoolVO> clusterPools =
> > > _storagePoolDao.listPoolsByCluster(agent.getClusterId());
> > > boolean hasNfs = false;
> > > for (StoragePoolVO pool : clusterPools) {
> > > if (pool.getPoolType() == StoragePoolType.
> NetworkFilesystem)
> > {
> > > hasNfs = true;
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > if (!hasNfs) {
> > > s_logger.warn(
> > > "Agent investigation was requested on
> host " +
> > agent +
> > > ", but host does not support investigation because it has
> no NFS
> > storage.
> > > Skipping investigation.");
> > > return Status.Disconnected;
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > There are two possibilities here. You do not have any NFS
> storage? Is
> > that
> > the case? Or maybe, for some reason, the call
> > "_storagePoolDao.listPoolsByCluster(agent.getClusterId())"
> is not
> > returning
> > any NFS storage pools. Looking at the "listPoolsByCluster "
> we will see
> > that the following SQL is used:
> >
> > Select * from storage_pool where cluster_id =
> <host'sClusterId> and
> > removed
> > > is not null
> > >
> >
> > Can you run that SQL to see the its return when your hosts
> are marked
> > as
> > disconnected?
> >
> >
> > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
www.shapeblue.com
ShapeBlue are the largest independent integrator of CloudStack technologies
globally and are specialists in the design and implementation of IaaS cloud
infrastructures for both private and public cloud implementations.
> Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> ShapeBlue are the largest independent integrator of CloudStack
> technologies globally and are specialists in the design and implementation
> of IaaS cloud infrastructures for both private and public cloud
> implementations.
>
>
>
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Jon Marshall <
> jms....@hotmail.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I reran the tests with the 3 NIC setup. When I configured
> the zone
> > through
> > > the UI I used the labels cloudbr0 for management, cloudbr1
> for guest
> > > traffic and cloudbr2 for NFS as per my original response
> to you.
> > >
> > >
> > > When I pull the power to the node (dcp-cscn2.local) after
> about 5
> > mins
> > > the host status goes to "Alert" but never to "Down"
> > >
> > >
> > > I get this in the logs -
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 WARN [c.c.h.KVMInvestigator]
> > > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) Agent
> investigation
> > was
> > > requested on host Host[-4-Routing], but host does not
> support
> > investigation
> > > because it has no NFS storage. Skipping investigation.
> > > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 DEBUG [c.c.h.
> HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
> > > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93)
> KVMInvestigator was
> > able to
> > > determine host 4 is in Disconnected
> > > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 INFO [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
> > > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) The agent
> from host
> > 4 state
> > > determined is Disconnected
> > > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 WARN [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
> > > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) Agent is
> > disconnected but
> > > the host is still up: 4-dcp-cscn2.local
> > >
> > > I don't understand why it thinks there is no NFS storage
> as each
> > compute
> > > node has a dedicated storage NIC.
> > >
> > >
> > > I also don't understand why it thinks the host is still up
> ie. what
> > test
> > > is it doing to determine that ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Am I just trying to get something working that is not
> supported ?
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31
> > > To: users
> > > Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to
> VMs
> > >
> > > What type of failover are you talking about?
> > > What ACS version are you using?
> > > What hypervisor are you using?
> > > How are you configuring your NICs in the hypervisor?
> > > How are you configuring the traffic labels in ACS?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Jon Marshall <
> jms....@hotmail.co.uk
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am close to giving up on basic networking as I just
> cannot get
> > failover
> > > > working with multiple NICs (I am not even sure it is
> supported).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What I would like is to use 3 NICs for management,
> storage and
> > guest
> > > > traffic. I would like to assign public IPs direct to the
> VMs which
> > is
> > > why I
> > > > originally chose basic.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I switch to advanced networking do I just configure a
> guest VM
> > with
> > > > public IPs on one NIC and not both with the public
> traffic -
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > would this work ?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingärtner
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingärtner
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
--
Rafael Weingärtner
