PVLAN is supported although there are some prerequisites
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/archived-cloudstack-administration/en/latest/networking_and_traffic.html#isolation-in-advanced-zone-using-private-vlan
On 11/4/18, 7:05 PM, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> wrote:
Probably MAC-based VLANs and custom scripting will work for you.
вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:04, li li <div...@hotmail.com>:
> Hi Ivan
>
>
>
> my target is:
>
> 1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.
>
> 2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.
>
>
>
> Any good suggestions?
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> 发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>
> 发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
> 收件人: users
> 主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?
>
> Hi Li,
> Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
> networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
> isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and
other
> stuff.
>
> вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li <div...@hotmail.com>:
>
> > HI ALL
> >
> > I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> > CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM
> or
> > XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks LLC
> Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
> Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>
--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
