Thank you! But I need to perform certain tests on CentOS-6 before to confirm that the patch I proposed is 100% correct. I tested it on CentOS-7, but I also would like to make sure that CentOS-6 will work fine as well.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:57:22PM +0100, Richard Lawley wrote: > If you're doing this because the official repo doesn't contain the > latest version then you can use this repo instead to get el6 packages > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.11/ > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2019, 11:04 Vladimir Melnik, <v.mel...@uplink.ua> wrote: > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > I'm trying to build the CentOS6-compatible packages (using this document: > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/installguide/building_from_source.html#building-rpms-from-source), > > running `./package.sh -d centos63`, but the files I get have the "el7" > > suffix in their names: > > cloudstack-agent-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-baremetal-agent-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-cli-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-common-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-integration-tests-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-management-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-marvin-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > cloudstack-usage-4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > > > Am I doing it wrong? > > > > Thanks in advance for the clue! > > -- V.Melnik
