I don't have spare hardware. I work for a small business, i.e., poor,
which is why the hardware is the antiques I listed, it's all basically
other company's garbage sourced from eBay. I tested it on a small
cluster used by QA to test software deployments on various versions of
Windows and Ubuntu Linux, our infrastructure is Centos for historical
reasons, not because there's any real reason to run Centos other than
standardization. We don't release our software until we make sure it
doesn't break anything, that's why we have a QA department (which is
peeved at me now but what else is new). Apparently Red Hat Software
thinks one of them (a QA department) is something that doesn't matter.
(Sorry if I sound annoyed, other people breaking my stuff annoys me). I
can roll things back to an earlier Centos, but it's going to be a major
effort, since I have to reinstall the OS on each of the servers one by
one. (Data lives elsewhere and configuration info is backed up there
nightly, that's not a problem, but we're still talking hours
reinstalling then restoring things from backups where I'd prefer to be
doing something that makes money for the company). Frankly, I'd prefer
to not do that, but if it's the only way to make things work,
downgrading to a insecure version of the OS with multiple known security
vulnerabilities that don't pass our corporate security policy, that's
what I'll do (I wrote the bloody policy, I'll just shut up the security
scanner when it yells and screams at me) . Or just switch to a real
Linux that doesn't break things when security fixes are released, if
such a thing exists, but that's a huge effort too, especially since my
configuration backups wouldn't just slide right in.
SIGH.
Ah well, off to work.
On 5/22/2019 7:56 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Eric,
did you actually test this in production?
Andrija
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 16:33, Eric Lee Green <eric.lee.gr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Okay. This makes sense.
And people wonder why Amazon decided to make their own Linux rather than
use Centos and why Ubuntu has seized huge market share from Red Hat in
the past few years. SIGH.
Downgrading my CentOS is not going to be easy. There were security
patches in the latest CentOS that I am required to have. It would
actually be easier to just switch to Ubuntu at this point since we're
talking a complete re-install anyhow. SIGH. Thank you, Red Hat Software.
I hope IBM fixes them, but I have my doubts.
On 5/22/2019 1:05 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Hi Eric, all,
I believe you might be hitting this one - issues on latest CentOS 7.6:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3333 due to changes in the OS
itself...
If you believe that is the case, please try with CentOS 7.4 (can confirm
works fine) and/or CentOS 7.5.
Best,
Andrija
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 09:04, Eric Lee Green <eric.lee.gr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 5/21/2019 11:10 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:
Hello Eric,
If the router version is displayed as UNKNOWN in the portal, it
would be
a connectivity issue. Check your connections related to firewall rules
between the ACP management hosts, hypervisor and VR. Is your VR
management
network setup correctly?
Communications between the hosts is working fine and I have not changed
the VR management network between the running 4.9 and the not-running
4.11. FIrewall rules appear to be the defaults set up by Cloudstack and
should properly forward VR traffic.
More tomorrow when I have some sleep since it is now midnight here in
the SF Bay area.
On Wed, 22 May 2019, 6:10 am Eric Lee Green, <eric.lee.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for the response, sorry if I sound frustrated, but this is
supposed to be a simple easy process and it's been horrible all the
way
through. 4.11.1 failed so I had to downgrade back to 4.9, and now
4.11.2
has failed to upgrade too. I've thus far spent around 16 hours of my
time on what should have taken an hour at most. I'm frustrated and
bummed.
[root@cloud2 ~]# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-7-6.1810.2.el7.centos.x86_64
[root@cloud2 ~]# rpm -q libvirt
libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.9.x86_64
[root@cloud1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep kvm
qemu-kvm-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.5.1.x86_64
qemu-kvm-common-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.5.1.x86_64
[root@cloud2 ~]# cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.10.0-862.6.3.el7.x86_64
(buil...@kbuilder.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red
Hat
4.8.5-28) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue Jun 26 16:32:21 UTC 2018
[root@cloud2 ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
...
processor : 23
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz
stepping : 2
microcode : 0x1f
cpu MHz : 3068.000
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 12
core id : 10
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 53
initial apicid : 53
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe
syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts
rep_good
nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni dtes64 monitor
ds_cpl
vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt
lahf_lm epb ssbd ibrs ibpb tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
dtherm
ida arat
bogomips : 6133.21
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
[root@cloud1 ~]# free
total used free shared buff/cache
available
Mem: 123596388 79795792 34047696 632116 9752900
39999332
Swap: 4194300 1956824 2237476
[root@cloud1 ~]# yum update
=========================================================================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=========================================================================================================================================================================
Updating:
cloudstack-agent x86_64 4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos
cloudstack411 47 M
cloudstack-common x86_64 4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos
cloudstack411 58 M
cloudstack-management x86_64 4.11.2.0-1.el7.centos
cloudstack411 82 M
Three compute servers running the above processor averaging 128gb of
memory apiece, two data servers running NFS for primary and secondary
storage. Running the 4.11.2 community RPM's above.
Yes, I did register the 4.11.2 systemvmtemplate before updating. The
routers in fact started with the template, it said 4.11.2 when I
opened
up the console window and looked at the login prompt. But they never
got
configured, when I logged in with root/password at the console prompt
they had no networking set up and no configuration provided, the
cloud-init output in /var/log was essentially blank.
Do I recall correctly that there is an issue with a particular version
of the hypervisor on the latest Centos 7? Any other information that
you
need? I think I provided the complete log file for the cloud-init of
the
router in another email...
On 5/21/2019 9:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Eric,
Can you describe your environment in detail such as management server
host distro, hypervisor version, current CloudStack version, did you
register the 4.11.2 systemvmtemplate beforw upgrading etc.
Regards.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
________________________________
From: Eric Lee Green <eric.lee.gr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 6:21:16 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Upgrade to Cloudstack 4.11.2 fails *AGAIN*
You may remember me as the person who had to roll back to Cloudstack
4.9.x because Cloudstack 4.11.1 wouldn't start any virtual machines
once
I upgraded to it, claiming that there were inadequate resources even
though I had over 150 gigabytes of memory free in my cluster and
oodles
of CPU free (and a minimum of 40gb on each node, plenty to start a
512mb
router VM). So now I'm trying to upgrade to Cloudstack 4.11.2 and
*again* it's misbehaving.
The symptom is that my virtual routers when I log into their console
show 4.11.2 but when I look at them in the console they say 'Version:
UNKNOWN'. Also when I try to ssh into their guest IP address or link
local IP address it fails. And when I try to start up a virtual
machine
that uses that virtual network, it says "Network unavailable', even
though the router for that network is showing up and running.
Clearly something's broken in the virtual routers but I don't know
what
because I can't get into the router virtual machines. How do I get
the
console password to get into the router virtual machines? It's
encrypted
in the database (duh), how do I decrypt it?
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
