Hi Alex, In our particular use case the Public Network is an SD WAN and we have a requirement of slightly smaller MTU than the standard 1500.
I have assumed that our traffic will be encapsulated into something else before delivery, I guess that is the reason for the requirement. What would be the easier way to add support for MTU tunning on VRs? I would be to contribute and implement it. Regards, On Wed, 2021-03-24 09:39 AM, Alex Mattioli <alex.matti...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi R, > > There's no ACS setting for the VR's MTU size. > Unless you are running storage traffic s in that network then jumbo frames > aren't of much use. I've ran some tests at the request of some customers in > my previous job, and with some very busy VRs and the performance gains for an > MTU of 9000 were statistically insignificant. > If your VRs are saturated your best option is to increase the resources for > its offering (if you need guidance with that, am happy to provide it) > > Anyway, what's your use case for jumbo frames? > > Regards, > Alex > > alex.matti...@shapeblue.com > http://www.shapeblue.com > 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rva...@privaz.io.INVALID " target="_blank"><rva...@privaz.io.INVALID> > Sent: 24 March 2021 09:23 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Virutal Router MTU > > Hi! > > I can see in the Global Parameters that it is possible to specify the MTU for > secondary storage VM. > > Is it possible to configure the MTU for a virtual router? how? > > Regards, > R. >
