-1
First, I didn't see much commitment in actively supporting and
maintaining this integration.
Second, there are many integrations, is terraform the one to pick for
using cloudstack from the view of the ASF?
A "plugin" for a software developed outside of ASF? What about puppet,
ansible, chef? The imbalance of this view results to a -1 from me.
Regards
René
On 15.04.21 11:05, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi All,
Following the discussion thread on Terraform [1], I would like to start a vote
to gather consensus on the following actions:
1. Create a new "cloudstack-terraform-provider" repository based on Apache
Licence v2.0 using re-licensed codebase of the archived/former terraform cloudstack
provider repository: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack (note:
re-licensing from MPL to AL will be done by Hashicorp)
2. Request ASF infra to enable issues, PR, and wiki features on the
repository
3. Work with the community towards any further maintenance, development,
and releases of the provider
4. Publish official releases on the official registry [2] if/after Apache
CloudStack project gets a verified account (published by PMC members with
access to the registry, or following guidelines from ASF infra if they've any)
The vote will be open for 120 hours, until Wed 21 April 2021.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
[1] https://markmail.org/message/iuggxin7kj6ri4hb
[2] https://registry.terraform.io/browse/providers
Regards.
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue