This is good idea.  Or else , we shall allow  manual upload via. GUI, and
mark for system template .

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 9:08 PM Pearl d'Silva <pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> I probably missed adding the PR link to the feature -
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4329. Please do provide you
> inputs.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Pearl
>
> ________________________________
> From: Pearl d'Silva <pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 5:49 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemVM template upgrade improvements
>
> Hi All,
>
> We have been working on a feature that simplifies SystemVM template
> install and upgrades for CloudStack. Historically we've required users to
> seed the template on secondary storage during fresh installation and
> register the template before an upgrade - this really does not make
> CloudStack turnkey, as we end up maintaining and managing them as a
> separate component - for example, users can't simply do an apt-get upgrade
> or yum upgrade to upgrade CloudStack.
>
> The feature works by automatically initiating registration of the SystemVM
> templates during upgrades or when the first secondary storage is added to a
> zone where the SystemVM template hasn't been seeded. This feature addresses
> several operational pain points for example, when the admin user forgets to
> register the SystemVM template prior to an upgrade and faces the issue of
> having to roll back the database midway during the upgrade process. With
> this feature the upgrade process is seamless, such that the end users do
> not need to worry about having to perform template registration, but rather
> have the upgrade process take care of everything that is required.
>
> In order to facilitate this feature, the SystemVM templates have to be
> bundled with the cloudstack-management rpm/deb package which causes the
> total noredist cloudstack-management package size to increase to about
> 1.6GB. We currently are packaging templates of only the three widely
> supported hypervisors - KVM, XenServer/XCP-ng and VMWare.
> (These templates are only packaged if the build is initiated with the
> noredist flag.)
>
> We'd like to get your opinion on this idea.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Pearl Dsilva
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Hean Seng

Reply via email to