Hi Mario, thanks for the reply. This was sent to the wrong mail list. If you want to join the voting, please, follow the official thread in DEV mail list: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8c21f7d8af2c85369c7ce2f8205dc8f1b24ebd0a24417ba501b79a0%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E
Best regards, Daniel On 2021/09/13 14:58:04, mario juliano grande-balletta <mario.balle...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > yes, go for it! > > good idea > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 14:54 +0000, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We had a discussion about standardizing the string libs we're using > > (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r806cd10b3de645c150e5e0e3d845c5a380a700197143f57f0834d758%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E). > > > > As I proposed, I'm opening this voting thread to see if all are in favor of > > using "commons.lang3" as the String standard library and for String > > operations not convered on "commons.lang3", we use our StringUtils. Then, > > if the vote passes, I will create the PR to address this change in the code > > base by removing unnecessary libraries, and changing the code to use > > "commons.lang3". > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Best regards, > > Daniel > > > > >
