I second what he said, I've ran ACS zones with 60+ hypervisors and 2,000 VMs from one single pair of storage servers delivering , all on NFS and no issues at all.
Just be sure to select the right vendor and size it correctly. -----Original Message----- From: Ivan Kudryavtsev <i...@bw-sw.com> Sent: 23 September 2021 11:02 To: users <users@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Recommendation for Storage. Abishek, NFS over a bunch of drives works just fine but has no means for failover (out of the box, when self-built). If your benchmark shows enough IO performance per VM, then NFS is just the way to go. Keep in mind that NFS can have various backing store technologies like NetApp appliances, Ceph, plain RAID volumes - it leads to different performance levels and reliability guarantees. As for accessor, NFS is OK. On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:56 PM Abishek <abckd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Every One, > > We are planning to go into cloud production with cloudstack 4.15 and > KVM host. We are currently considering nfs as storage because of the > performance. Is it feasible to use NFS as primary storage type in > production environment. Will there be any bottleneck of any offsets in > future(if any one has deployed nfs as storage in production). Shall I > prefer iscsi with NFS or any other storage type above NFS for > production environment. > > Thank You. >
