Antoine,
Out of curiosity, what would be your use/business case for such microVM
feature?
Perhaps I'm misinformed, but had a quick look at it and it's just a
"slim" KVM. It seems like it would make sense to use something like this
if you have significant "serverless" type of workloads, or indeed sell
such thing publicly.
I can see why Amazon wants Firecracker, it goes with their narrative
(and "hype" may I add) for "serverless".
PS: Opennebula is pretty nice, love the "contextualisation", very
powerful; but yeah, quirky, like everything else.
---
Nux!
www.nux.ro
On 2022-03-03 15:30, Antoine Boucher wrote:
microVM support is definitely a feature I’m missing that we were
accustom to from OpenNebula, fortunately CloudStack makes up for many
OpenNebula weirdness…
-Antoine
On Mar 3, 2022, at 10:04 AM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ricardo,
CloudStack does not support customized qemu machine type for vms or
templates (All VMs use `pc` or `q35`) .
The feature is currently on our idea board.
-Wei
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 13:00, Ricardo Pertuz <ricardo.per...@kuasar.co>
wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to deploy microvm (firecracker approach) using qemu on
Cloudstack?
As explained in this link
https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/system/i386/microvm.html
Regards,
