Hi Bryan,
Sorry for the late reply. Yes we had zero downtime but no provisioning of
new machines got affected.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:48 PM Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Pratik,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> Just to confirm, your storage volumes had zero downtime, right?
>
> Regards,
> Bryan
> On 19 Oct 2023 at 3:18 PM +0800, m...@swen.io, wrote:
> > Hey Pratik,
> >
> > can you elaborate more on this stability problems? We are doing also a
> CS + Linstor PoC at the moment and we did a lot of stress testing it
> without any problems on linstor side. I am curious if we did miss some
> tests.
> > We are using a place count of 2 in a 3 node cluster.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Swen
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Pratik Chandrakar <chandrakarpra...@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2023 07:15
> > An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Comparing Hyperconverged + Converged Setup with Cloudstack
> + Linbit
> >
> > Hi Bryan,
> >
> > We did a small PoC with Cloudstack + Linbit SDS(3 Time replica) in a
> hyperconverged setup. There was no issue with HA, the VMs successfully
> restarted from different nodes. However, we did face stability problems
> with Linbit HA, which prevented us from provisioning new storage or virtual
> machines.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:42 PM Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > We are doing some evaluation with Cloudstack + Linbit SDS.
> > >
> > > Has anyone had any experience using these with a Converged or
> > > Hyperconverged setup?
> > >
> > > My understanding is that Converged is the best for HA Because:
> > >
> > > • If any storage node goes down, there is zero downtime. (3 Time
> > > Replica) • If any compute node goes down, it will be restarted in
> > > another node as part of HA feature.
> > >
> > > But what about Hyperconverged setup? Can we also set zero downtime
> > > with storage and fast VM recovery?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bryan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Regards,*
> > *Pratik Chandrakar*
> >
> >
>


-- 
*Regards,*
*Pratik Chandrakar*

Reply via email to