Thanks Daniel and Bobby for bringing this. Yes, it makes sense to conclude the vote after next week.
Therefore, all, please continue testing RC1. Vote will remain open til 07 Jan 2024. Regards, Abhishek On Thu, 28 Dec, 2023, 15:07 Boris Stoyanov, <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 to extend the vote to 1st week of Jan, most people are out on holiday > > Bobby. > > From: Daniel Salvador <dvsalvador...@gmail.com> > Date: Wednesday, 27 December 2023 at 15:23 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>, > d...@cloudstack.apache.org <d...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC1 > Thanks, Abhishek! > > As a good part of the community is in holiday mood, I think we can > postpone the vote tailing to the first week of January 2024. What do you > think? > > Best regards, > Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi) > > On 12/22/23 10:58, Nux wrote: > > That's a nice Christmas gift, Abhishek, thanks! > > > > I'll be testing after the new year. > > > > > > > > On 2023-12-22 13:48, Abhishek Kumar wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts > >> up for > >> a vote: > >> > >> Git Branch and Commit SH: > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20231222T1711 > >> Commit: 92c0fc8fc25c916a7f3c7875d924b2d14d437501 > >> > >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > >> location): > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/ > >> > >> PGP release keys (signed using > >> 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866): > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > >> > >> For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to: > >> http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC1/ > >> > >> Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory > >> before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed: > >> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/ > >> > >> Vote will be open for 120 hours. > >> > >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > >> indicate > >> "(binding)" with their vote? > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> Happy Christmas everyone! > >> > >> @Devs - sorry the previous email wasn't copied to the user mailing list > >> correctly. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Abhishek > >> > >>> > > > >
