On Monday 15 April 2024 06:33:26 PM (+07:00), Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Is eth0 added to cloudbr0 bridge ?
>
further to this once you add the same machine as a host from the gui, you end
up with this, which is curious to me because its using inet 169.254.0.1/16
scope global cloud0
on cloud0 and my CentOs template never downloads... so something is off
ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group
default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master cloudbr0
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 84:8f:69:fd:ea:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp2s0f0
3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default
qlen 1000
link/ether 84:8f:69:fd:ea:1d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
altname enp2s0f3
4: cloudbr0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
group default qlen 1000
link/ether 4a:d3:e8:49:08:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 46.23.82.133/25 brd 46.23.82.255 scope global cloudbr0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::48d3:e8ff:fe49:800/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: cloudbr1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state
DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether 3e:63:d5:63:5d:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: cloud0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
group default qlen 1000
link/ether b6:67:93:f4:bd:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 169.254.0.1/16 scope global cloud0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::b467:93ff:fef4:bdad/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
7: eno1.500@eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
master breno1-500 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 84:8f:69:fd:ea:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
8: breno1-500: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state
UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 66:8f:69:eb:49:9e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
cloud0 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:00:a9:fe:7a:64 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:a9ff:fefe:7a64/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
10: vnet1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
cloudbr0 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:00:ae:00:00:66 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:aeff:fe00:66/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
11: vnet2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
breno1-500 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:00:00:00:00:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:ff:fe00:1/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
12: vnet3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
cloud0 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:00:a9:fe:c6:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:a9ff:fefe:c63a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
13: vnet4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
cloudbr0 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:00:9b:00:00:6b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:9bff:fe00:6b/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
14: vnet5: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master
breno1-500 state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:00:3e:00:00:02 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:3eff:fe00:2/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
root@cs:~# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
breno1-500 8000.668f69eb499e no eno1.500
vnet2
vnet5
cloud0 8000.b66793f4bdad no vnet0
vnet3
cloudbr0 8000.4ad3e8490800 no eno1
vnet1
vnet4
cloudbr1 8000.3e63d5635d18 no
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 1:14 PM lists <li...@optimcloud.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I did in fact get a debian 11 install up and running pretty much as a
> > management server and almost good as a host. Have to figure out why the
> > cloidbr0 is on a 169.xxx adress and why no centos template was downloaded.
> > Systemvms came up without a problem.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Apr 15, 2024 at 3:58 PM, Nux <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Found some notes on Debian here, there could be others..
> > > https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c
> > >
> > > On 2024-04-15 09:54, Nux wrote:
> > > > Not as yet, no formal support for Debian.
> > > > That said, this could change in the future..
> > > > If you're a keen Debianista then it might be worth having a go
> > > > nevertheless, it might just work or with minimum changes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2024-04-13 10:49, Embedded wrote:
> > > >> the install guide states Preferred: CentOS/RHEL 7.2+ or Ubuntu
> > > >> 16.04(.2) or higher
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> would this include say debian 10/11 as a manager / and host/kvm
> > > >> hypervisor ???
> > >
> >
>
--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com
