I know some users deploy a pfsense or Linux vm as gateway in L2 network or isolated network without source nat. No matter which software/os is used, users have to configure the vms manually. Some features (e.g static nat, pf,lb, userdata) are not supported either. I think VR is still the best option with most supported services so far. What is the purpose of the router ? Gateway or other service provider?
-Wei On Wednesday, May 29, 2024, Marty Godsey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello All, > > What is the best way, or how are you providing a router for customers that > is not a virtual router? For example, if I have someone who wants to use > PfSense for their router instead of the virtual router, what’s the best way > to do this and make it as seamless as possible for the customer? > > I can see ways to do it, but I am curious to know how other people perform > this function. > > Thanks in advance. 😊 >
