Thanks, Ivet, and thanks for coordinating this. The proposed group sounds good to me, and I am looking forward to helping with the CFP review.
Just out of curiosity, through which channel did Wido and Simon volunteer? I may have missed an email or an earlier discussion. For future occasions, I think it would be good for the call for reviewers, and the resulting group, to be visible on the relevant public mailing list, so that every interested community member has the same opportunity to volunteer. This helps keep the process open and avoids any impression that decisions are being made elsewhere. For this year, I am happy to proceed with the group as listed. What are the next steps? Will you start a separate email thread with the four reviewers so that we can agree on the review criteria, scoring process, conflicts of interest and final selection process? ** I can already confirm that I will not take part in reviewing, scoring, discussing or deciding on my own presentation proposal, and I assume the same conflict-of-interest principle will apply to all reviewers ** Regards, Andrija On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:31 PM Ivet Petrova <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We already have Wido, Simon, Andrija and Giles. > Thanks all for the commitment but we have enough people in this. > > On the other hand we still need help for the CCC on: > - getting more sponsors > - people on place for setting up. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 4 Aug 2026, at 18:46, Rajiv Jain < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Andrija, > > > > Shall I help hear, I am relatively new compare to many here, though? > > > > Regards > > Rajiv Jain > > > >> On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 at 9:13 PM, Andrija Panic <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Bumping this thread now that the CFP has closed, and also to see who > else > >> might be interested in helping with the reviews. > >> > >> ASF does not appear to define a strict minimum number of organisations > >> that should be involved. Still, for diversity and transparency, I think > it > >> would be good to have at least three or four reviewers from different > >> organisations, where possible. > >> > >> Ivet has been coordinating the CFP so far, so we have ShapeBlue > >> represented, and I would also be happy to participate independently, as > I > >> am no longer with ShapeBlue. It would be great to have another one or > two > >> people from other organisations volunteering as well. > >> > >> Does that make sense to everyone? > >> > >> Best, > >> Andrija > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 7:55 AM Ivet Petrova < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> You are more than welcome to help on this. Once we finalise the CFP and > >>> close it, will email you. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> <https://www.cloudstackcollab.org> > >>>> On 24 Jul 2026, at 21:43, Andrija Panic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I would like to volunteer to participate in the CFP review and > programme > >>> committee for the CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2026. > >>> > >>> I would be happy to help review the submissions, contribute to the > >>> programme selection and assist with arranging the final schedule. > >>> > >>> I am also planning to submit a presentation proposal myself. > Naturally, I > >>> would recuse myself completely from reviewing, scoring or > participating in > >>> any discussion or decision concerning my own submission. > >>> > >>> Please count me in when the review team is being formed. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Andrija > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Andrija Panić > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Andrija Panić > >> > -- Andrija Panić
