28.08.2015 12:25, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
In my case the final solution will be shipped to different counties
which means different time zones.

Why not to keep all HW clocks in UTC?

And the replacement of one of the nodes in the working solution could
happens.
So the possibilities of the issue to happen is still there.

Thank you,
Kostya

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net
<mailto:and...@beekhof.net>> wrote:


    > On 21 Aug 2015, at 11:06 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko 
<konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com
    <mailto:konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com>> wrote:
    >
    > As I wrote in the previous email, it could happen when NTP servers are 
unreachable before Pacemaker's start, and then, after some time, NTP becomes 
reachable again.
    > So it is possible that time will be synchronized in any direction: 15 min 
or 23 min or 1 hour or 12 hours backward/forward.

    If your clock is drifting by hours during a reboot cycle, then I
    would suggest you have a hardware issue that needs attending to.

     > And in that case the bug will appear itself.
     >
     > Thank you,
     > Kostya
     >
     > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Andrew Beekhof
    <and...@beekhof.net <mailto:and...@beekhof.net>> wrote:
     >
     > > On 8 Aug 2015, at 12:43 am, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
    <konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com
    <mailto:konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com>> wrote:
     > >
     > > Hi Andrew,
     > >
     > > So the issue is:
     > >
     > > Having one node up and running, set time on the node backward
    to, say, 15 min (generally more than 10 min), then do "stop" for a
    resource.
     > > That leads to the next - the cluster fails the resource once,
    then shows it as "started", but the resource actually remains "stopped".
     > >
     > > Do you need more input from me on the issue?
     >
     > I think “why” :)
     >
     > I’m struggling to imagine why this would need to happen.
     >
     > >
     > > Thank you,
     > > Kostya
     > >
     > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Andrew Beekhof
    <and...@beekhof.net <mailto:and...@beekhof.net>> wrote:
     > >
     > > > On 4 Aug 2015, at 7:31 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
    <konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com
    <mailto:konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com>> wrote:
     > > >
     > > >
     > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof
    <and...@beekhof.net <mailto:and...@beekhof.net>> wrote:
     > > > Github might be another.
     > > >
     > > > I am not able to open an issue/bug here
    https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker
     > >
     > > Oh, for pacemaker bugs see http://clusterlabs.org/help.html
     > > Can someone clearly state what the issue is?  The thread was
    quite fractured and hard to follow.
     > >
     > > >
     > > > Thank you,
     > > > Kostya
     > > > _______________________________________________
     > > > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
    <mailto:Users@clusterlabs.org>
     > > > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
     > > >
     > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
     > > > Getting started:
    http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
     > > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
     > >
     > >
     > > _______________________________________________
     > > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
    <mailto:Users@clusterlabs.org>
     > > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
     > >
     > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
     > > Getting started:
    http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
     > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
     > >
     > > _______________________________________________
     > > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
    <mailto:Users@clusterlabs.org>
     > > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
     > >
     > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
     > > Getting started:
    http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
     > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
    <mailto:Users@clusterlabs.org>
     > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
     >
     > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
     > Getting started:
    http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
     > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
    <mailto:Users@clusterlabs.org>
     > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
     >
     > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
     > Getting started:
    http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
     > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org


    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org <mailto:Users@clusterlabs.org>
    http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

    Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
    Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
    Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to