> On 27 Jan 2016, at 8:51 PM, Ming-Xun Zhong <zhon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > What is the roadmap of constraint on instance of cloned resource ? Aka > rsc-instance/with-rsc-instance/first-instance/then-instance > > I found these features in old mail [1] and are using them in production. > The newer version of crmsh remove support for these constraints. > > Yes I read that Andrew recommend not doing this. The story is each of my > resource > need bind two IP address on different network derivatived from external ID > not under > my control. > > Will this feature be promoted in future version of Pacemaker?
Not until if/when we can come up with a compelling use-case for it. Maybe you’ve hit one, could you expand on what you’re doing and why? > I could add support to crmsh if there is no objection. > > [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/2014-February/msg00049.html > > -- > Bill Ming-Xun Zhong 鍾明勳 > http://about.me/zhongmx > http://twitter.com/zmx > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org