Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> writes: >> At the same time, I have thought before that the current functionality >> is not great. Having to stop resources before removing them is if >> nothing else annoying! I have a tentative change proposal to this where >> crmsh would stop the resources even if --force is not set, and there >> would be a flag to pass to stop to get it to ignore whether resources >> are running, since that may be useful if the resource is misconfigured >> and the stop action doesn't work. > > That should result in fencing, no? I think that is RA issue if that > happens. Particularly, imho RAs should not run validate_all on stop action.
Yes that's true, it is only really an issue without fencing. But unless the first thing configured is fencing, that is also the situation where misconfiguration is more likely.. > > Best, > Vladislav > > -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // kgronl...@suse.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
