On 06/17/2016 11:12 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > (that being said, I've already presented my subversive opinion that > shell introduces more headaches than reasonable, as using it may be > most natural and with almost no barriers to entry, but it's actually quite > hard to make scripts bullet-proof; say chances the script will be derailed > just with a space-contained [not talking about quotes] parameter are > quite high: http://clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/000403.html)
C has no strings, shells (plural) are evil, perl is unmaintainable, VM (or whatever you call it: runtime, garbagle-collected)-based ones are top-heavy and unpredictable, and python is the worst of all worlds. But hey, it still way ahead of C++ on sanity points. Anyone tried gnat lately? -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
