On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:10:08 -0800 Israel Brewster <isr...@ravnalaska.net> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:39 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <j...@dalibo.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:11:06 -0800 > > Israel Brewster <isr...@ravnalaska.net> wrote: [...] > > I **guess** if you really want a shutdown to occurs, I meant «failover» here, not shutdown, sorry. > > you need to simulate a real failure, not shutting down the first node > > cleanly. Try to kill corosync. > > From an academic standpoint the result of that test (which, incidentally, > were the same as the results of every other test I've done) are interesting, > however from a practical standpoint I'm not sure it helps much - most of the > "failures" that I experience are intentional: I want to fail over to the > other machine so I can run some software updates, reboot for whatever reason, > shutdown temporarily to upgrade the hardware, or whatever. As far as I know, this is switch over. Planed switch over. And you should definitely check PAF then :) [...] -- Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais Dalibo _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
