Yes, I had precreated the script file with the required permission.

[root@*node1* alerts]# ls -l /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4140 Aug 14 01:51 /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh
 [root@*node2* alerts]# ls -l /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4139 Aug 14 01:51 /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh
[root@*node3* alerts]# ls -l /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4139 Aug 14 01:51 /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh

Later I observed that user "hacluster" is not able to create the log file
under /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.log.
I am sorry, I should have observed this in the log before posting the
query. Then I gave the path as /tmp/alert_file.log, it is able to create
now.
Thanks for pointing it out.

I have one more clarification,

if the resource is running in node2,
[root@node2 tmp]# pcs resource
 TRR    (ocf::heartbeat:TimingRedundancyRA):    Started node2

And I executed the below command to make it standby.
[root@node2 tmp] # pcs node standby node2

Resource shifted to node3, because of higher location constraint.
[root@node2 tmp]# pcs resource
 TRR    (ocf::heartbeat:TimingRedundancyRA):    Started node3.


I got the log file created under node2(resource stopped) and node3(resource
started).

Node1 was not notified about the resource shift, I mean no log file was
created there.
Its because alerts are designed to notify the external agents about the
cluster events. Its not for internal notifications.

Is my understanding correct ?

Regards,
Sriram.



On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Klaus Wenninger <kwenn...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 08/14/2017 12:32 PM, Sriram wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> I used the alerts as well, seems to be not working.
>
> Please check the below configuration
> [root@node1 alerts]# pcs config show
> Cluster Name:
> Corosync Nodes:
> Pacemaker Nodes:
>  node1 node2 node3
>
> Resources:
>  Resource: TRR (class=ocf provider=heartbeat type=TimingRedundancyRA)
>   Operations: start interval=0s timeout=60s (TRR-start-interval-0s)
>               stop interval=0s timeout=20s (TRR-stop-interval-0s)
>               monitor interval=10 timeout=20 (TRR-monitor-interval-10)
>
> Stonith Devices:
> Fencing Levels:
>
> Location Constraints:
>   Resource: TRR
>     Enabled on: node1 (score:100) (id:location-TRR-node1-100)
>     Enabled on: node2 (score:200) (id:location-TRR-node2-200)
>     Enabled on: node3 (score:300) (id:location-TRR-node3-300)
> Ordering Constraints:
> Colocation Constraints:
> Ticket Constraints:
>
> Alerts:
>  Alert: alert_file (path=/usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh)
>   Options: debug_exec_order=false
>   Meta options: timeout=15s
>   Recipients:
>    Recipient: recipient_alert_file_id (value=/usr/share/pacemaker/
> alert_file.log)
>
>
> Did you pre-create the file with proper rights? Be aware that the
> alert-agent
> is called as user hacluster.
>
>
> Resources Defaults:
>  resource-stickiness: INFINITY
> Operations Defaults:
>  No defaults set
>
> Cluster Properties:
>  cluster-infrastructure: corosync
>  dc-version: 1.1.15-11.el7_3.4-e174ec8
>  default-action-timeout: 240
>  have-watchdog: false
>  no-quorum-policy: ignore
>  placement-strategy: balanced
>  stonith-enabled: false
>  symmetric-cluster: false
>
> Quorum:
>   Options:
>
>
> /usr/share/pacemaker/alert_file.sh does not get called whenever I trigger
> a scenario for failover.
> Please let me know if I m missing anything.
>
>
> Do you get any logs - like for startup of resources - or nothing at all?
>
> Regards,
> Klaus
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sriram.
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 17:40 +0530, Sriram wrote:
>> > Hi Ulrich,
>> >
>> >
>> > Please see inline.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Ulrich Windl
>> > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>> >         >>> Sriram <sriram...@gmail.com> schrieb am 08.08.2017 um
>> >         09:30 in Nachricht
>> >         <CAMvdjurcQc6t=ZfGr=cRL25Xq0Je9h9F_TvZXyxVAn3n
>> >         +dv...@mail.gmail.com>:
>> >         > Hi Ken & Jan,
>> >         >
>> >         > In the cluster we have, there is only one resource running.
>> >         Its a OPT-IN
>> >         > cluster with resource-stickiness set to INFINITY.
>> >         >
>> >         > Just to clarify my question, lets take a scenario where
>> >         there are four
>> >         > nodes N1, N2, N3, N4
>> >         > a. N1 comes up first, starts the cluster.
>> >
>> >         The cluster will start once it has a quorum.
>> >
>> >         > b. N1 Checks that there is no resource running, so it will
>> >         add the
>> >         > resource(R) with the some location constraint(lets say score
>> >         100)
>> >         > c. So Resource(R) runs in N1 now.
>> >         > d. N2 comes up next, checks that resource(R) is already
>> >         running in N1, so
>> >         > it will update the location constraint(lets say score 200)
>> >         > e. N3 comes up next, checks that resource(R) is already
>> >         running in N1, so
>> >         > it will update the location constraint(lets say score 300)
>> >
>> >         See my remark on quorum above.
>> >
>> > Yes you are right, I forgot to mention it.
>> >
>> >
>> >         > f.  N4 comes up next, checks that resource(R) is already
>> >         running in N1, so
>> >         > it will update the location constraint(lets say score 400)
>> >         > g. For the some reason, if N1 goes down, resource(R) shifts
>> >         to N4(as its
>> >         > score is higher than anyone).
>> >         >
>> >         > In this case is it possible to notify the nodes N2, N3 that
>> >         newly elected
>> >         > active node is N4 ?
>> >
>> >         What type of notification, and what would the node do with it?
>> >         Any node in the cluster always has up to date configuration
>> >         information. So it knows the status of the other nodes also.
>> >
>> >
>> > I agree that the node always has upto date configuration information,
>> > but an application or a thread needs to poll for that information. Is
>> > there any way, where the notifications are received through some
>> > action function in RA. ?
>>
>> Ah, I misunderstood your situation, I thought you had a cloned resource.
>>
>> For that, the alerts feature (available in Pacemaker 1.1.15 and later)
>> might be useful:
>>
>> http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-pcs/html-sing
>> le/Pacemaker_Explained/index.html#idm139900098676896
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Sriram.
>> >
>> >         >
>> >         > I went through clone notifications and master-slave, Iooks
>> >         like it either
>> >         > requires identical resources(Anonymous) or Unique or
>> >         Stateful resources to
>> >         > be running
>> >         > in all the nodes of the cluster, where as in our case there
>> >         is only
>> >         > resource running in the whole cluster.
>> >
>> >         Maybe the main reason for not having notifications is that if
>> >         a node fails hard, it won't be able to send out much status
>> >         information to the other nodes.
>> >
>> >         Regards,
>> >         Ulrich
>> >
>> >         >
>> >         > Regards,
>> >         > Sriram.
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         >
>> >         > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Sriram
>> >         <sriram...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >         >
>> >         >>
>> >         >> Thanks Ken, Jan. Will look into the clone notifications.
>> >         >>
>> >         >> Regards,
>> >         >> Sriram.
>> >         >>
>> >         >> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Ken Gaillot
>> >         <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >         >>
>> >         >>> On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 12:31 +0530, Sriram wrote:
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > Hi Team,
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > We have a four node cluster (1 active : 3 standby) in
>> >         our lab for a
>> >         >>> > particular service. If the active node goes down, one of
>> >         the three
>> >         >>> > standby node  becomes active. Now there will be (1
>> >         active :  2
>> >         >>> > standby : 1 offline).
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > Is there any way where this newly elected node sends
>> >         notification to
>> >         >>> > the remaining 2 standby nodes about its new status ?
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> Hi Sriram,
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> This depends on how your service is configured in the
>> >         cluster.
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> If you have a clone or master/slave resource, then clone
>> >         notifications
>> >         >>> is probably what you want (not alerts, which is the path
>> >         you were going
>> >         >>> down -- alerts are designed to e.g. email a system
>> >         administrator after
>> >         >>> an important event).
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> For details about clone notifications, see:
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>>
>> >         http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-pcs/html-sing
>> >         >>>
>> >         le/Pacemaker_Explained/index.html#_clone_resource_agent_req
>> uirements
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> The RA must support the "notify" action, which will be
>> >         called when a
>> >         >>> clone instance is started or stopped. See the similar
>> >         section later for
>> >         >>> master/slave resources for additional information. See the
>> >         mysql or
>> >         >>> pgsql resource agents for examples of notify
>> >         implementations.
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> > I was exploring "notification agent" and "notification
>> >         recipient"
>> >         >>> > features, but that doesn't seem to
>> >         work. /etc/sysconfig/notify.sh
>> >         >>> > doesn't get invoked even in the newly elected active
>> >         node.
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> Yep, that's something different altogether -- it's only
>> >         enabled on RHEL
>> >         >>> systems, and solely for backward compatibility with an
>> >         early
>> >         >>> implementation of the alerts interface. The new alerts
>> >         interface is more
>> >         >>> flexible, but it's not designed to send information
>> >         between cluster
>> >         >>> nodes -- it's designed to send information to something
>> >         external to the
>> >         >>> cluster, such as a human, or an SNMP server, or a
>> >         monitoring system.
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>>
>> >         >>> > Cluster Properties:
>> >         >>> >  cluster-infrastructure: corosync
>> >         >>> >  dc-version: 1.1.17-e2e6cdce80
>> >         >>> >  default-action-timeout: 240
>> >         >>> >  have-watchdog: false
>> >         >>> >  no-quorum-policy: ignore
>> >         >>> >  notification-agent: /etc/sysconfig/notify.sh
>> >         >>> >  notification-recipient: /var/log/notify.log
>> >         >>> >  placement-strategy: balanced
>> >         >>> >  stonith-enabled: false
>> >         >>> >  symmetric-cluster: false
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > I m using the following versions of pacemaker and
>> >         corosync.
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > /usr/sbin # ./pacemakerd --version
>> >         >>> > Pacemaker 1.1.17
>> >         >>> > Written by Andrew Beekhof
>> >         >>> > /usr/sbin # ./corosync -v
>> >         >>> > Corosync Cluster Engine, version '2.3.5'
>> >         >>> > Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Red Hat, Inc.
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > Can you please suggest if I m doing anything wrong or if
>> >         there any
>> >         >>> > other mechanisms to achieve this ?
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> >
>> >         >>> > Regards,
>> >         >>> > Sriram.
>>
>> --
>> Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
>> http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list: 
> Users@clusterlabs.orghttp://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to