>>> Kristoffer Grönlund <[email protected]> schrieb am 04.12.2017 um 16:02 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > Tomas Jelinek <[email protected]> writes: > >>> >>> * how is it shutting down the cluster when issuing "pcs cluster stop --all"? >> >> First, it sends a request to each node to stop pacemaker. The requests >> are sent in parallel which prevents resources from being moved from node >> to node. Once pacemaker stops on all nodes, corosync is stopped on all >> nodes in the same manner. >> >>> * any race condition possible where the cib will record only one node up > before >>> the last one shut down? >>> * will the cluster start safely? > > That definitely sounds racy to me. The best idea I can think of would be > to set all nodes except one in standby, and then shutdown pacemaker > everywhere...
Why not all nodes? > > -- > // Kristoffer Grönlund > // [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
