On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Ulrich Windl
<ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>
>
>>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> schrieb am 11.01.2018 um 12:41 in
> Nachricht
> <caa91j0waoqg46434gvvz_8yw5ve09fqhshqp-vqjo7uv6fe...@mail.gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Ulrich Windl
>> <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On the tool changes, I'd prefer --move and --un-move as pair over --move 
>>> and --clear
>> ("clear" is less expressive IMHO).
>>
>> --un-move is really wrong semantically. You do not "unmove" resource -
>> you "clear" constraints that were created. Whether this actually
>> results in any "movement" is unpredictable (easily).
>
> You undo what "move" does: "un-move". With your argument, "move" is just as 
> bad: Why not "--forbid-host" and "--allow-host" then?
>

That would be less confusing as it sounds more declarative and matches
what actually happens - setting configuration parameter instead of
initiating some action.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to