On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > >>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> schrieb am 11.01.2018 um 12:41 in > Nachricht > <caa91j0waoqg46434gvvz_8yw5ve09fqhshqp-vqjo7uv6fe...@mail.gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Ulrich Windl >> <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> On the tool changes, I'd prefer --move and --un-move as pair over --move >>> and --clear >> ("clear" is less expressive IMHO). >> >> --un-move is really wrong semantically. You do not "unmove" resource - >> you "clear" constraints that were created. Whether this actually >> results in any "movement" is unpredictable (easily). > > You undo what "move" does: "un-move". With your argument, "move" is just as > bad: Why not "--forbid-host" and "--allow-host" then? >
That would be less confusing as it sounds more declarative and matches what actually happens - setting configuration parameter instead of initiating some action. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org