28.03.2018 13:25, Ulrich Windl пишет: > Hi! > > For crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-18.2 I think there's a bug in the manual > describing resource sets: > > sequential > If true, the resources in the set do not depend on each other > internally. Setting sequential to true implies a strict order of dependency > within the set. > > Obviously "true" cannot mean both: "do not depend" and "depend". My guess is > that the first true has to be false. > > In addition, isn't the syntax with resource sets missing something (despite > from the description)?: > > colocation <id> <score>: resource_sets > [node-attribute=<node_attr>] > > comparing to > > colocation <id> <score>: <rsc>[:<role>] <with-rsc>[:<role>] > [node-attribute=<node_attr>] > > I expected the with-rsc to be at the end also when using resource sets... >
No, colocating sets works indeed differently, syntax is correct (for XML examples in pacemaker explained that is ...) > I came across this when trying to add a colocation like this: > colocation col_LV inf:( cln_LV cln_LV-L1 cln_LV-L2 cln_ML cln_ML-L1 cln_ML-L2 > ) cln_VMs > > crm complained about this: > ERROR: 1: syntax in role: Unmatched opening bracket near <cln_ML-L1> parsing > 'colocation ...' > ERROR: 2: syntax: Unknown command near <cln_ml-l2> parsing 'cln_ml-l2 ) > cln_VMs' > (note the lower case) > You need to create set consisting of single resource. I do not know if it possible to colocate set and single resource - none of examples show it. See also https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-resource-sets-colocation.html _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org