Hello Andrei, > Then you need to set symmetrical="false". yep, now it seems to work now, thank you very much!
> I assume this would be "pcs constraint order set ... > symmetrical=false". yes almost: pcs constraint order set nfs-server vm_storage ha-ip action=start setoptions symmetrical=false Thank you very very much! best regards Stefan > Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Juni 2018 um 22:13 Uhr > Von: "Andrei Borzenkov" <arvidj...@gmail.com> > An: users@clusterlabs.org > Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync doesn't start any resource > > 22.06.2018 11:22, Stefan Krueger пишет: > > Hello Andrei, > > > > thanks for this hint, but I need this "special" order. In an other setup it > > works. > > > > Then you need to set symmetrical="false". Otherwise pacemaker implicitly > creates reverse order which leads to deadlock. I am not intimately > familiar with pcs, I assume this would be "pcs constraint order set ... > symmetrical=false". > > > best regards > > Stefan > > > >> Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juni 2018 um 06:57 Uhr > >> Von: "Andrei Borzenkov" <arvidj...@gmail.com> > >> An: users@clusterlabs.org > >> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync doesn't start any resource > >> > >> 21.06.2018 16:04, Stefan Krueger пишет: > >>> Hi Ken, > >>> > >>>> Can you attach the pe-input file listed just above here? > >>> done ;) > >>> > >>> And thank you for your patience! > >>> > >> > >> You delete all context which makes it hard to answer. This is not web > >> forum where users can simply scroll up to see previous reply. > >> > >> Both your logs and pe-input show that nfs-server and vm-storage wait for > >> each other. > >> > >> My best guess is that you have incorrect ordering for start and stop > >> which causes loop in pacemaker decision. Your start order is "nfs-server > >> vm-storage" and your stop order is "nfs-server vm-storage", while it > >> should normally be symmetrical. Reversing order in one of sets makes it > >> work as intended (verified). > >> > >> I would actually expect that asymmetrical configuration still should > >> work, so I leave it to pacemaker developers to comment whether this is a > >> bug or feature :) > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> > >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org