On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Stefan K <shado...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi Kristoffer, > > ok I see, but why maintain both? Let a coin decide which one, but I think its > not very helpful to maintain both. >
Do you volunteer to implement automatic conversion to new agents including parameters adjustment? > best regards > Stefan > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2018 um 10:55 Uhr >> Von: "Kristoffer Grönlund" <kgronl...@suse.com> >> An: "Stefan K" <shado...@gmx.net>, users@clusterlabs.org >> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] difference between external/ipmi and fence_ipmilan >> >> "Stefan K" <shado...@gmx.net> writes: >> >> > OK I see, but it would be good if somebody mark one of this as deprecated >> > and then delete it. So that noone get confused about these. >> > >> >> The external/* agents are not deprecated, though. Future agents will be >> implemented in the fence-agents framework, but the existing agents are >> still being used (not by RH, but by SUSE at least). >> >> Cheers, >> Kristoffer >> >> > best regards >> > Stefan >> > >> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 um 18:26 Uhr >> >> Von: "Ken Gaillot" <kgail...@redhat.com> >> >> An: "Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering >> >> welcomed" <users@clusterlabs.org> >> >> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] difference between external/ipmi and >> >> fence_ipmilan >> >> >> >> On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 12:00 +0200, Stefan K wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > can somebody tell me the difference between external/ipmi and >> >> > fence_ipmilan? Are there preferences? >> >> > Is one of these more common or has some advantages? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks in advance! >> >> > best regards >> >> > Stefan >> >> >> >> The distinction is mostly historical. At one time, there were two >> >> different open-source clustering environments, each with its own set of >> >> fence agents. The community eventually settled on Pacemaker as a sort >> >> of merged evolution of the earlier environments, and so it supports >> >> both styles of fence agents. Thus, you often see an "external/*" agent >> >> and a "fence_*" agent available for the same physical device. >> >> >> >> However, they are completely different implementations, so there may be >> >> substantive differences as well. I'm not familiar enough with these two >> >> to address that, maybe someone else can. >> >> -- >> >> Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org >> >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org >> > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >> >> -- >> // Kristoffer Grönlund >> // kgronl...@suse.com >> > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org