>>> Jan Pokorný <[email protected]> schrieb am 28.06.2018 um 20:23 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: [...] > * * * > > So now the promised questions; just send a reply where you [x] tick > your selections for the questions below, possibly with some more > commentary on the topic, and preferrably on‑list (single of your > choice is enough): > > 1. In your cluster configurations, do you carry meta‑attributes > other than those recognized by pacemaker? > > [ ] no
--> NO > > [ ] yes (if so, can you specify whether for said constraints > rules, as a way to permanently attach some kind of > administrative piece of information, whether you > have the whole custom tooling around this, etc.?) > > 2. How do you feel about said meta‑attributes' namespace separation > proposal (as summarized in documentation edit per above link)? > > [ ] no feelings/not related to my use cases (e.g., haven't used > custom meta‑attributes possibility before, no inclination to > use that in the future) --> X (the above) > > [ ] too cumbersome, better to live with the risk of the future > clashes now (and with the risk of distant future automatic > upgrade doing accidentally a wrong thing) > > [ ] acceptable, but only as an interim solution > > [ ] acceptable without complaints > > * * * > > I am also keen to hear if this rather non‑intrusive change alone could > be a show‑stopper for some. > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > [1] e.g. for primitive resources: > > https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en‑US/Pacemaker/1.1/html‑single/Pacem > aker_Explained/index.html#_resource_meta_attributes > [2] > https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en‑US/Pacemaker/1.1/html‑single/Pacem > aker_Explained/index.html#_node_attribute_expressions > > ‑‑ > Jan (Poki) _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
