Adam
Thank you very much.I really appreciate your help!
These are 2 virtual machines ESXi do you see any possible hardware
limitations ? (Don't know much about VMware).
I don't know much about VMware ether. The only limitation of bonding is
switch (evento some bonding modes don't need hw support).
Honza
czw., 14.03.2019, 17:13 użytkownik Jan Friesse <jfrie...@redhat.com>
napisał:
Adam,
What is more recommended for providing corosync/pacemaker link
redundancy?
>
a) Configure two rings and rrp within corosync, if yes:
- can we use two separate VLANs connected to two separate physical
NIC for the heartbeat connections
Yes
- do they have to be the same networks
No, it actually must be different one
- which mode should I use for a two node cluster passive or active
Passive. Active doesn't make progress till timeout when one link is
disconnected
b) bonding – if yes, why ?
B is correct. RRP is just seriously broken - that is the reason why it
was replaced in Corosync 3. When you have a bonding capable HW, use it.
Regards,
Honza
Thank you !
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
