Hi Rohit, Did you see the two earlier replies?
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2019-July/026035.html On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 11:14 +0530, Rohit Saini wrote: > Gentle Reminder!! > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:14 PM Rohit Saini < > rohitsaini111.fo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Gentle Reminder!! > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM Rohit Saini < > > rohitsaini111.fo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy. > > > Currently I am using pacemaker/corosync for my local two-node > > > redundancy. > > > As I understand, booth needs atleast 3 nodes to work correctly to > > > do the automatic failovers. So it does not fit my requirements. > > > > > > Few queries are > > > 1) Can I make use of my current pacemaker/corosync to make it > > > work across my two geographical nodes for automatic failovers, > > > considering I am ready to ignore split-brain scenarios. I may > > > need to tweak some timers I believe. Is this approach possible? > > > 2) Any disadvantages of going this way? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rohit > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ -- Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/