So I tried an experiment. I had tried switch over to 'udpu' unicast transport, but corosync threw an error starting up (which I did not drill down on yet.)
I went over to my test environment and did the same thing and it worked fine, the cluster worked and everything. One thing that is different there is the test environment is on a network with CIDR /22, and the production network is on a CIDR /26. So, for my bindnetaddr on my test network, I have the address of my VIP, or '192.168.193.113'. That would be a network base of '192.168.192.0'. But my production network is on '192.168.83.131', That would be a network base of '192.168.83.128'. I have tried hardcoding the 'bindnetaddr' to the network base '192.168.83.128', but it still throws an error. Perhaps it is 'zeroing' out the bindnetaddr least significant byte to make the network base? Is it possible that the calculation of my base network in 'bindnetaddr' doesn't account for networks with CIDR mask bits greater than 24? (which would have non-zero least significant bytes.) Thanks, Rick On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 05.05.2020 16:44, Nickle, Richard пишет: > > Thanks Honza and Andrei (and Strahil? I might have missed a message in > the > > thread...) > > > > Yep, all messages from Strahil end up in spam folder. > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
