Thanks Honja. That's helpful. Let's say I don't use qnetd, can I achieve same with booth arbitrator? Booth arbitrator works for geo-clusters, can the same arbitrator be reused for local clusters as well? Is it even possible technically?
Regards, Rohit On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:32 PM Jan Friesse <jfrie...@redhat.com> wrote: > Rohit, > > > Hi Team, > > Can I execute corosync-qnetd and booth-arbitrator on the same VM in a > > different geo site? What's the recommendation? Will it have any > limitations > > in a production deployment? > > There is no technical limitation. Both qnetd and booth are very > lightweight and work just fine with high latency links. > > But I don't really have any real-life experiences with deployment where > both booth and qnetd are used. It should work, but I would recommend > proper testing - especially what happens when arbitrator node disappears. > > > Due to my architecture limitation, I have only one arbitrator available > > which is on a 3rd site. To handle cluster split-brain errors, I am > thinking > > to use same arbitrator for local cluster as well. > > STONITH is not useful in my case as it is limited only to ILO and VIRT. > > Keep in mind that neither qdevice nor booth is "replacement" for stonith. > > Regards, > Honza > > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > Thanks, > > Rohit > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Manage your subscription: > > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > > > >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
