16.12.2020 19:05, Gabriele Bulfon пишет: > Looking at the two logs, looks like corosync decided that xst1 was offline, > while xst was still online. > I just issued an "ifconfig ha0 down" on xst1, so I expect both nodes cannot > see other one, while I see these same lines both on xst1 and xst2 log: > > ec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: warning: pe_fence_node: Cluster node > xstha1 will be fenced: peer is no longer part of the cluster
You should pay more attention to what you write. While occasional typos of course happen, you consistently use wrong names for nodes which do not match actual logs. If you continue this way nobody will be able to follow. > > why xst2 and not xst1? Logs mention neither xst1 not xst2. _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/