>>> Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> schrieb am 29.03.2021 um 19:23 in Nachricht <ceabbfac6cf21b72288d101a050cccdff712f54e.ca...@redhat.com>: > Scores are in the range ‑1,000,000 to +1,000,000 (also known as > "infinity"). > > Numerically higher scores are preferred in whatever the context is > (e.g. higher stickiness means more sticky, higher colocation score > means more likely to stay together, etc.).
So can you confirm that lower-priority resources are relocated (moved) first? > > On Mon, 2021‑03‑29 at 13:05 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Hi! >> >> The question may sound completely stupid, but I didn't find the >> formal definition of a "high priority" in the pacemaker docs. >> Many years ago I thought lower numbers are higher priorities, but >> then I flipped the concept, thinking higher numbers are higher >> priorities. >> As it seems resource placement (i.e.: relocation) is don using lower >> priorities first, I wonder whether ther is consent among the >> developers what a "higher priority" is. >> >> Regards, >> Ulrich >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Manage your subscription: >> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >> > ‑‑ > Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/