I always though that the setup is the same, just the node count is only one. I guess you need pcs, corosync + pacemaker.If RH is going to support it, they will require fencing. Most probably sbd or ipmi are the best candidates. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:52, d tbsky<tbs...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi: I found RHEL 8.2 support single node cluster now. but I didn't find further document to explain the concept. RHEL 8.2 also support "disaster recovery cluster". so I think maybe a single node disaster recovery cluster is not bad.
I think corosync is still necessary under single node cluster. or is there other new style of configuration? thanks for help! _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
