On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:45:40 -0400 Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 2021-07-21 3:26 a.m., Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:28:30 +0000 (UTC) > > Strahil Nikolov via Users <users@clusterlabs.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> consider using a 3rd system as a Q disk. Also, you can use iscsi from that > >> node as a SBD device, so you will have proper fencing .If you don't have a > >> hardware watchdog device, you can use softdog kernel module for that. Best > > > > Having 3 nodes for quorum AND watchdog (using softdog in last resort) is > > enough, isn't it? > > But yes, having a shared storage to add a SBD device is even better. > > > > Regards, > > The third node with storage-based death is a way of creating a fence > configuration.
Yes, poison pill. > It works because it's fencing, not because it's quorum. That's not what I said. Two node + sbd is safe. OK. My consideration/question was: 3 nodes + watchdog, without storage-based death, looks good enough to me. Do I miss something? Regards, _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/