>>> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> schrieb am 10.10.2021 um 16:52 in Nachricht <b2dd249c-a887-8e53-3010-1c2852525...@gmail.com>: > On 10.10.2021 14:29, martin doc wrote:
... > For each resource pacemaker computes allocation scores for each node > (taking into account colocation). Node with the highest score wins. If > multiple nodes have the same score, pacemaker should select node > according to balancing strategy. >From the output of "crm_simulate -LUs" it's very hard to see that. My guess >was that utilization even influences the initial score. For example: Allocation scores and utilization information: ... native_assign_node: prm_stonith_sbd utilization on h16: pcmk__clone_allocate: cln_DLM allocation score on h16: 18060 pcmk__clone_allocate: cln_DLM allocation score on h18: 15030 pcmk__clone_allocate: cln_DLM allocation score on h19: 15030 ... My guess it that the score from above is from utilization. > > Given three resources we know about, balancing can sensibly apply only > to VIP; App is restricted to the node where VIP is (will become) active. > So there is no choice. > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
