>>> martin doc <db1...@hotmail.com> schrieb am 14.10.2021 um 22:51 in Nachricht <ps2p216mb054683c7ac571e328d6e27aec2...@ps2p216mb0546.korp216.prod.outlook.com>:
... > > If I understand this correctly then this probably makes every documented > example of using ocf:pacemaker:ping with a colocation statement wrong because > the only way to see the effect of dampen is to use a rule that references the > value of pingd directly. That or the script for ping has a major flaw with > respect to dampen. ... I'd see colocation as additional restriction: If pingd does not run on a node, it cannot set the attribute value (guessing/hoping that any existing value would be deleted or set to 0 though). Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/