On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:13 AM Strahil Nikolov via Users < users@clusterlabs.org> wrote:
> Shouldn't you use kind ' Mandatory' and simetrical TRUE ? > > If true, the reverse of the constraint applies for the opposite action > (for example, if B starts after A starts, then B stops before A stops). > If the script should be run before any change then it sounds as if an asymmetric order would be desirable. So you might create at least two order constraints explicitly listing the actions. But I doubt that this explains the unexpected behavior described. As Ulrich said a little bit more info about the config would be helpful. Regards, Klaus > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:11, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >>> Jonno <jstk...@gmail.com> schrieb am 10.02.2022 um 20:43 in Nachricht > <CADGLmTe311U71NKSEBoeogkk+WcCHpt44MH1T-4hy-=j-nl...@mail.gmail.com>: > > Hello, > > > > I am having some trouble getting my 2 node active/passive cluster to do > > what I want. More specifically, my cluster is removing the VIP from the > > cluster whenever I attempt a failover with a command such as "crm > resource > > move rsc_cluster_vip node2". > > > > When running the command above, I am asking the cluster to migrate the > VIP > > to the standby node, but I am expecting the cluster to honour the order > > constraint, by first running the script resource named "rsc_lsb_quiesce". > > The order constraint looks like: > > > > "order order_ABC rsc_lsb_quiesce rsc_cluster_vip msl_ABC:promote > > rsc_lsb_resume" > > > > But it doesn't seem to do what I expect. It always removes the VIP > entirely > > from the cluster first, then it starts to follow the order constraint. > This > > means my cluster is in a state where the VIP is completely gone for a > > couple of minutes. I've also tried doing a "crm resource move > > rsc_lsb_quiesce > > node2" hoping to trigger the script resource first, but the cluster > always > > removes the VIP before doing anything. > > > > My question is: How can I make the cluster follow this order constraint? > I > > I'm very sure you just made a configuration mistake. > But nobody can help you unless you show your configuration and example > execution of events, plus the expected order of execution. > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > > need the cluster to run the "rsc_lsb_quiesce" script against a remote > > application server before any other action is taken. I especially need > the > > VIP to stay where it is. Should I be doing this another way? > > > > Regards, > > Jonathan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
