On Monday, August 8, 2022, Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >>>> Reid Wahl <nw...@redhat.com> schrieb am 07.08.2022 um 04:01 in Nachricht > <capiuu9_rvo1xui3swkegni5xqsu-oeqkby9pmokwp-wrc5d...@mail.gmail.com>: >> On Saturday, August 6, 2022, Strahil Nikolov via Users < >> users@clusterlabs.org> wrote: >>> By the way I remember a lot of problems with fence_ilo & fence_ilo_ssh >> (due to ILO). >>> If you receive timeouts use fence_ipmi (you have to enable IPMI in ILO). >>> Best Regards, >>> Strahil Nikolov >> >> Of the two, fence_ipmilan/fence_ilo is much more reliable than the >> SSH-based agents in my experience. > > Trying to fence remotely via in-band (cluster network) in inherently broken IMHO.
The fencing network isn't always the same as the cluster network (assuming that the corosync network is what is meant there). The other options of course are sbd and fabric fencing in environments that support them. > >> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 23:34, Reid Wahl >>> <nw...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Manage your subscription: >>> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ >>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Reid Wahl (He/Him) >> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat >> RHEL High Availability - Pacemaker > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Manage your subscription: > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/ > > -- Regards, Reid Wahl (He/Him) Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat RHEL High Availability - Pacemaker
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
