This sounds great - exactly what I had in mind - perhaps "JXStringTemplate" (in deference to the original concept) ??
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/05/03 06:31:38 PM >>> hi derek, I alse read that paper and agree that it was revealing. it also made me rethink view generation (the bad symtpoms had of course already occurred to me). my current idea (pretty blurry ATM) is to create a stripped down version of the JXT generator (remove the 'power features') and provide it with 'view contexts'. there would be a 'facility' (kind of factory) which would return a 'view context' for a specified view identifier. now the simple JXT generator would have all it needs to 'fill the holes'. > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag > von Derek Hohls > Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2004 14:23 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: JXTemplates - what's in a name? > > > An April 2004 post pointed me to Terence Parr's article on "Enforcing > Strict MV Separation in Template Engines". (see article link at: > http://www.stringtemplate.org ). This is a fascinating read and, to > me, a classic in the field. > <snip what="almost everything">;-)</snip> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
