Marc Salvetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > i just noticed that > > foo/bar/fooo/baar doesn't match the pattern "foo/**/*/*" but > match the > pattern "foo/**/*" > > Is that a bug or normal behavior ?
Similar inexplicable behaviour was also noticed a few months ago by Ard Schrijvers. I can't recall if he got a good explanation from anyone, but you might want to search for that thread. He was pretty thorough in testing what did and did not match what, and it sounds like a bug to me. mcv. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
