> Is this something that needs to be taken up on the dev list?
Not sure. If you think it would I can forward it up there (though I'd have to join the dev list). > I am sure that htmlArea was the best choice at the time > that the CForms package was first put together, but some > technology just does not last [unlike Cocoon, of course!] > and continued reliance on (or seeming support for) a module > that is no longer actively maintained is not to Cocoon's > advantage... I agree that using an unsupported and undeveloped unit for Cocoon wouldn't be in the best interest of the users. Presumably as Xinha was based on htmlArea3 then the port would be pretty simple. Gary ***************************************************************** The information contained in this message may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended for the addressee only, If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. ***************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
