>I wonder if you are experiencing the old spaghetti code problem: you can write good, readable programs in assembly code and nasty, unreadable spaghetti in (insert your view of the perfect programming language).
That is certainly right. But in practice I can't assume people writing nice code. The advantage of my perfect programming language, for example java is then the following: I can analyse dependencies in the form of method calls quite easily (assuming nobody did use reflection or things like that). With xslt I have to understand ugly and complex xpath pattern matching (which Bertrand suggested to use :-( )
<<winmail.dat>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
