On 12.06.2007 16:11, Askild Aaberg Olsen wrote:

Is there anything wrong with this approach (it seems to work)?  Is there
a better way?
I guess passing the continuation.id in the URI prevents caching in your pipeline.

Actually you don't want to have that cached anyways since you need the updated continuation id :)

Joerg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to