On 12.06.2007 16:11, Askild Aaberg Olsen wrote:
I guess passing the continuation.id in the URI prevents caching in your pipeline.Is there anything wrong with this approach (it seems to work)? Is there a better way?
Actually you don't want to have that cached anyways since you need the updated continuation id :)
Joerg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]