Hello Ard,
Thank you for this suggestion. The loadPackage vs. loadClass is the detail I was missing. I will try this. Thank you again, Ferda _____ From: Ard Schrijvers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:24 AM To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript cocoon.load() Hello Ferda, we have experienced similar problems. We upgraded to the last rhino version (At that moment the trunk, but there might be a new release which you can use) and replaced in all flowscript files all loadPackage declarations with loadClass (and then only the classes you need). Something changed regarding the classloader making the loadPackage very slow for 2.1.10 and higher. For using the rhino trunk, we also needed some cocoon 2.1.11 revision, but I do not remember which revision number. You might want to try the trunk Regards Ard _____ From: Ferda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:10 PM Posted To: Cocoon User List Conversation: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript cocoon.load() Subject: RE: Performance problems with 2.1.10 using FOM JavaScript cocoon.load() * The problem is that when upgrading to Cocoon 2.1.10 for * one of our software packages to make use of all the improvements * in 2.1.10, we're hitting an enormous performance hit. We * basically see that requests which would normally take 10ths * to 100thms of microseconds now takes seconds up to a minute * to execute, where the processor is fully used. Has there been any solution to this issue? I am rather desperate to for this to be solved because I have upgraded a production system that supports 50 simultaneous video stream feeds and response time has degraded to between 5 to 10 minutes after around 20 feeds have started up. Thank you, Ferda
