Another topic I would like to point out regarding saxon :
If you like to take advantage of the advanced features of saxon you may leave the area of free licenses. And to my experience, saxon's commercial licensing model is unhandable for open source projects. Greetings Andreas ----- Original Message ---- From: Robby Pelssers <robby.pelss...@ciber.com> To: users@cocoon.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:09:39 AM Subject: RE: [Cocoon 2.1.11] Saxon and speed improvements I can't give you a performance comparison but I'm always sticking with SAXON. I'm very happy with it's performance and I've done quite a few projects. And one big benefit is that saxon allows me to write xslt in a more compact way. Kind regards, Robby -----Original Message----- From: Kamal Bhatt [mailto:bh...@tt.com.au] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 2:08 AM To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: [Cocoon 2.1.11] Saxon and speed improvements Hi, I am trying to improve performance for Cocoon. I noticed that XSLT seems to take a bit of processing time (not lots, but significant to consider). Can anyone who is using Saxon for XSLT processing tell me if there is an improvement in performance (versus using Xalan)? It would be nice if anyone can give me some figures for comparison). Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org
