Thanks for replying. We use Cocoon online to serve (<10) coworkers. What do you 
mean with "off-line preparation"?
I heard about the good performance of iText. Since we do only xml processing i 
need a way to apply xsl:fo stylesheet and afaik there is no xsl fo renderer for 
iText. 



Matthias



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Jos Snellings <jos.snelli...@pandora.be>
An: users@cocoon.apache.org
Gesendet: Freitag, den 12. November 2010, 14:45:20 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [C2.2] Fop Performance Issue with large documents

Hi Matthias,

Do you want to do that on line? Is off-line preparation a possibility?
As an alternative to FOP you could try iText which is completely 
procedural if you want!

Jos

On 11/12/2010 11:16 AM, Matthias Müller wrote:
> Hi there,
> i ran into massive performance problems using Fop serializing large FO files
> (PDFs with 500+ pages).
>
> It takes up to 30 minutes for a single PDF and needs a lot of memory and cpu
> power.
> If i do the processing locally (no Cocoon but fop.bat), it takes about 2
> minutes.
> I know that FOP is not performant with large documents, but i only face that
> when running inside Cocoon.
>
> Is this a configuration issue?
> Are there alternatives to FOP/Cocoon?
> How do you process large xml based documents to pdf?
> At the moment i still use Fop 0.20.5, what about the performance with Fop 1.0?
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org
>
>
>    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@cocoon.apache.org

Reply via email to