On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:25:04PM -0000, Andreas Hauser wrote: > > From time to time one will "svk sync" to import the FreeBSD changes. > The conflicts will not be to many because our changes will mostly > be in files/. That way we keep a well maintained big ports tree that > we can commit to as much as we want.
It doesn't solve the problem that we inheriantly depend on the UNAME hack for ports to work. Yes, a lot breaks without it, but having it in place also prevents *proper* support in third party packages. > If really pkgsrc is your way, then present it as better alternative > instead of just pushing it with policy like officially boycotting > dfports (which is what asmodai and joerg announced afair). STOP INSULTING ME. I said before that I don't have time to waste and that is what fixing after ports is. For pkgsrc I can be at least somewhat sure that the same issue won't hunt me again and again. Joerg
