--- "Martin P. Hellwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danial Thom wrote: > > --- "Martin P. Hellwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> <cut all> > >> Okay so when your the expert on practical > >> implementation, what do you > >> make of the surfnet internet2 test results > >> (they did actually test > >> current "normal" hardware too) that prove > your > >> "practical" hypothesis > >> wrong? Or do you just deny the results and > >> continue on trolling? > >> > > > > What test are you referring to, and what do > you > > think it disproves? > > > > > Dear Danial, > > Your lack of knowledge on this topic is not a > valid excuse of being > irrational stubborn. Are you related to Edgar Allan Poe by some chance? I'm not sure I know which "topic" you're referring to, since all you do is make vague references to things that don't seem related to anything. First you cited switch specs without an example or what part of the spec made your point, and then you made some vague reference to a large organization that's in bed with Cisco, without mentioning any specific test or what point the test proves. I understand that the last time you said something you were badly beaten down, so maybe you're just afraid to say anything as it may tarnish your reputation as someone who knows something? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com